Take a good look around the room you’re sitting in. Anything
which is made of plastic is an oil based product. Anything which you did not
personally dig out of the ground was transported to you using oil. Like it or
not, the global economy is utterly dependent on this resource. A great deal of
fuss has been made of the recent International Energy Authority report
which argued that by 2020 the USA will be the world’s biggest oil producer, and
will be more than self sufficient by 2030. This fuss is justified, but perhaps
not quite in the way that people think.
The key thing to understand about oil as a resource is that
the oil market is integrated on a
global level. This means that instead of thinking about where each
individual country gets its supplies from, we need to think about a single global
level of supply, and how it matches a single global level of demand. Once we
understand this, we can understand the real significance of the US increase in
oil production.
It will not mean that the US is insulated from the economic
effects of an oil price shock. If, for example, OPEC were to repeat what happened in 1973
and constrict oil production then the US would suffer a dramatic recession,
despite theoretically being able to supply itself. In reality the US would be
contributing to a global ‘bathtub’ of oil production, which without the OPEC
contribution would have shrunk yet would still be expected to meet the same
level of global demand. The oil price would rise sharply, causing said global
economic crisis.
It follows from this that the USA, and indeed everybody else,
will still have an interest in maintaining global supplies. Wars in
oil rich Middle Eastern states will still be likely, although the
participants may change. In a world where geopolitical power is not just
concentrated in the USA (hello China), more countries can be expected to have
an interest in a global resource such as oil, and be more willing to act to
secure it rather than free riding on the back of US actions as happens now.
So far, the increase in US production looks pretty irrelevant.
This would be a foolish view to take. If, as the report predicts, the US is
exporting oil by 2030, then that’s a huge source of revenue. A quick glance at the
architecture
in Qatar is testament to the enormous wealth that oil generates. That won’t
go amiss in the USA. The diversification away from the Middle East should also
make the global oil market more stable, so OPEC’s influence will be diminished,
even if it is not removed. It should be noted that the increase in US supply is
a result of shale oil, which is extracted by “fracking”, a process with grave
environmental consequences. These, and the climate change which comes with a
hydrocarbon economy, will need to be dealt with.
The overall point here is that the USA becoming an oil
exporter will be an important geopolitical trend in the coming decades, but to
understand its significance we have to break away from the false idea of ‘energy
independence’ that has obsessed
US leaders since the 1970’s. Oil doesn’t work like that.
No comments:
Post a Comment